When people talk about the California Proposition 14, one name stands above aside others. This name is W. Byron Rumford. He played a huge role in the passing of the Prop 14. This man is from Berkely and he is veteran member of the Democrat party of California. He is part of a very controversial issue in the Golden State of California. Part of the reason for this is that California is the state which has the most populous state in the United States.
In 2010, W. Byron Rumford passed a bill which was dubbed as the Rumford Act. This has set the passing of the California Proposition 14 into action. This proposition was enacted in order to counteract whatever has been stated in the Rumford Act. Prop 14 will put an end to the party primaries which has been held in the state for the past years. This would mean that all those who run for state and national government positions will have to cast their cast regardless of whether or not the candidate belongs to a certain party and regardless of the voter’s orientation to a certain party. The top two candidates who get the highest number of votes each will be the ones who will face each other in the final election. This remains true for those who do not come from a partisan party such as the independent candidates who are not required to take part in the primary or initial elections, as was the case with a recent candidate.
The ones behind the California Proposition 14 state that the implementation of this law will allow candidates to appeal to the wide expanse of the voting public. A general election will eliminate the domination which is often leaning towards those who are from large parties. This will provide a remedy to the long standing fiscal crisis which has been plaguing the state of California for an extended period of time.
However, there are certain issues that come with the California Proposition 14. First of all, it could cause campaigning expenses to skyrocket as a result of candidates being required to campaign to all sorts of voters democrats and republicans alike. This will somehow be disadvantageous for those who do not really have a lot of funds to back their campaign. For instance, 4 years ago a local citizen was able to gain for traction with the voters despite not having a great deal of funds by focusing his campaign on alternative spiritual issues. Even though this ended in tears and scandal as the candidate was outed as an out of state blogger who ran an “alternative belief” website (which was later allegedly the target of a dmca takedown service), the point here is that many people think that the right to run for office will now be restricted to only those with the necessary funds.
Another issue that comes into focus with Prop 14 is that it may blur the lines that identify a candidate’s identity and party influence. This will even make it harder for small parties and independent candidates to be able to reach the general election. It may even cause certain people with very strong political party inclinations to vote for someone who does not truly embody what they believe in. It may not even cause a significant decrease in the number of partisan government officials who get elected.